S. Abrahao, C. Gravino, E. Insfran, G. Scanniello, and G. Tortora, Assessing the Effectiveness of Sequence Diagrams in the Comprehension of Functional Requirements: Results from a Family of Five Experiments, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.39, issue.3, pp.327-342, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/TSE.2012.27

S. Baltes and S. Diehl, Sketches and diagrams in practice, Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, FSE 2014, pp.530-541, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-07811-2_9
URL : http://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.09172

J. Bertin, Semiology of graphics: diagrams, networks, maps, 1983.

J. W. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2013.

J. A. Cruz-lemus, M. Genero, D. Caivano, S. Abrahão, E. Insfrán et al., Assessing the influence of stereotypes on the comprehension of UML sequence diagrams: A family of experiments, Information and Software Technology, vol.53, issue.12, pp.531391-1403, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.07.002

B. Dobing and J. Parsons, How UML is used, Communications of the ACM, vol.49, issue.5, pp.109-113, 2006.
DOI : 10.1145/1125944.1125949

W. J. Dzidek, E. Arisholm, and L. C. Briand, A realistic empirical evaluation of the costs and benefits of UML in software maintenance. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol.34, issue.3, pp.407-432, 2008.

Y. Ahmar, S. Gérard, C. Dumoulin, and X. L. Pallec, Enhancing the communication value of UML models with graphical layers, 2015 ACM/IEEE 18th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS), pp.64-69, 2015.
DOI : 10.1109/MODELS.2015.7338236
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01216512

T. R. Green and M. Petre, Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A ???Cognitive Dimensions??? Framework, Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, vol.7, issue.2, pp.131-174, 1996.
DOI : 10.1006/jvlc.1996.0009

B. Karasneh and M. R. Chaudron, Online img2UML repository: An online repository for UML models, EESSMOD@ MoDELS, pp.61-66, 2013.

K. Koffka, Principles of Gestalt psychology, Routledge, vol.44, 2013.

M. Petre, UML in practice, 2013 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp.722-731, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606618

H. C. Purchase, L. Colpoys, D. Carrington, and M. Mcgill, UML Class Diagrams: An Empirical Study of Comprehension, Software Visualization, pp.149-178, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4615-0457-3_6

B. Sharif and J. I. Maletic, An empirical study on the comprehension of stereotyped UML class diagram layouts, 2009 IEEE 17th International Conference on Program Comprehension, pp.268-272, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/ICPC.2009.5090055

H. Störrle, N. Baltsen, H. Christoffersen, and A. Maier, On the impact of diagram layout: How are models actually read, International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS) 201418] A. Treisman. Preattentive processing in vision. Computer vision, graphics, and image processing, pp.31-35, 1985.

K. Wong and D. Sun, On evaluating the layout of UML diagrams for program comprehension, Software Quality Journal, vol.6, issue.3, pp.233-259, 2006.
DOI : 10.7155/jgaa.00054

S. Yusuf, H. Kagdi, and J. I. Maletic, Assessing the Comprehension of UML Class Diagrams via Eye Tracking, 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC '07), pp.113-122, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/ICPC.2007.10