Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Comparison of the concept of “responsibility” in neuroscience and in French criminal law: A cross-literature review for the psychiatric forensic practice

Abstract : In forensic psychiatry, experts have to determine the level of responsibility of a subject with regard to their acts. Neuroscience and cognitive sciences have been increasingly studying the brain functions that are supposed to underlie individual responsibility. In neuroscience, impairment of responsibility is underlain by disruptions of different types of cognitive processes. This processes are executive functions, theory of mind, agency, volition and empathy. In the juridical conception, the term of responsibility refers to a broader perspective than in the neuroscientific approach.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-02403117
Contributeur : Lilloa Université de Lille <>
Soumis le : mardi 10 décembre 2019 - 17:32:26
Dernière modification le : mardi 17 décembre 2019 - 02:25:38

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Damien Galland, Carol Jonas, Renaud Jardri, Maroussia Wilquin, Olivier Cottencin, et al.. Comparison of the concept of “responsibility” in neuroscience and in French criminal law: A cross-literature review for the psychiatric forensic practice. La Presse Médicale, Elsevier Masson, 2016, Presse medicale (Paris, France 1983), 45, pp.559-566. ⟨10.1016/j.lpm.2016.03.018⟩. ⟨hal-02403117⟩

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

34