Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

The “Hero-Protector Narrative”: Manufacturing Emotional Consent for the Use of Force

Abstract : How do political leaders manufacture collective emotions to justify the use of force? This article introduces the “hero-protector narrative” as a conceptual model to analyze how political leaders try to manufacture specific collective emotions to encourage their audience to perceive violence as the only morally acceptable course of action. In our model, we formalize a set of distinctive narrative structures (roles and sequences), which are combined to activate compassion and moral anger as well as identification with “heroic” behavior. Furthermore, we argue that the resonance of this narrative draws on values of hyper-masculinity in patriarchal societies. As such this narrative is to be found across different types of actors (state/nonstate) and culturally diverse settings. To test our model, we use a computer-assisted QDA approach. We compare systematically discourses produced by political actors legitimizing the use of force versus actors opposing the use of force. We find that discourses supporting the use of force, such as those produced by George W. Bush and Osama bin Laden in the context of the Iraq war, share the structural characteristics of the hero-protector narrative. In this regard, they differ remarkably from violence-opposing discourses, regardless of their cultural background.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées
Contributeur : LillOA Université de Lille Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : jeudi 25 juin 2020 - 14:39:05
Dernière modification le : jeudi 10 septembre 2020 - 10:46:21




Maéva Clément, Thomas Lindemann, Eric Sangar. The “Hero-Protector Narrative”: Manufacturing Emotional Consent for the Use of Force. Political Psychology, Wiley, 2016, Political Psychology, 38 (6), pp.991-1008. ⟨10.1111/pops.12385⟩. ⟨hal-02881106⟩



Consultations de la notice