E. Ambrosini, M. Costantini, and C. Sinigaglia, Grasping with the eyes, Neurophysiology, vol.2, issue.3, pp.1437-1442, 2011.

E. Ambrosini, V. Reddy, A. De-looper, M. Costantini, B. Lopez et al., , 2013.

, Looking Ahead: Anticipatory Gaze and Motor Ability in Infancy, PLoS ONE, vol.8, issue.7, pp.1-9


C. Ansuini, A. Cavallo, C. Bertone, and C. Becchio, The visible face of intention: 7 Why kinematics matters, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.5, pp.1-6, 2014.


P. Bach, T. Nicholson, and M. Hudson, The affordance-matching hypothesis: how 10 objects guide action understanding and prediction, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol.11, 2014.

P. Bach and K. C. Schenke, Predictive social perception: Towards a unifying 13 framework from action observation to person knowledge. Social and Personality 14 Psychology Compass, vol.11, 2017.

D. A. Baldwin, J. A. Baird, M. M. Saylor, and M. A. Clark, Infants Parse Dynamic 16, 2001.

, Action. Child Development, vol.72, issue.3, pp.708-717

D. Bates, M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models 18, 2015.

, Using lme4, Journal of Statistical Software, vol.67, issue.1

J. S. Buresh and A. L. Woodward, Infants track action goals within and across agents, 2007.

, Cognition, vol.104, issue.2, pp.287-314

C. Catmur, Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, p.22, 2015.

D. Lewkowicz, F. Quesque, Y. Coello, and Y. N. Delevoye-turrell, Individual 11 differences in reading social intentions from motor deviants, Frontiers in Psychology, vol.12, issue.6, pp.1-12, 2015.

J. Loucks and M. Pechey, Human Action Perception is Consistent, Flexible, and 14 Orientation Dependent, Perception, vol.45, issue.11, pp.1222-1239, 2016.


S. G. Luke, Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R, Behavior 17 Research Methods, vol.49, pp.1494-1502, 2017.

V. Manera, C. Becchio, B. Schouten, B. G. Bara, and K. Verfaillie, Communicative 19 interactions improve visual detection of biological motion, PLoS ONE, vol.6, issue.1, 2011.


D. Mirman, Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R, 2014.

, Brain Research, vol.225, issue.2, pp.261-275

T. Nicholson, M. Roser, and P. Bach, Understanding the goals of everyday 3 instrumental actions is primarily linked to object, not motor-kinematic, information: 4 Evidence from fMRI, PLoS ONE, vol.12, issue.1, pp.1-21, 2017.


M. A. Novack, E. M. Wakefield, and S. Goldin-meadow, Cognition, vol.146, pp.339-348, 2016.

B. Ocampo and A. Kritikos, Interpreting actions: The goal behind mirror neuron 9 function, Brain Research Reviews, vol.67, issue.1-2, pp.260-267, 2011.


R. C. Oldfield, The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory, 1971.

, Neuropsychologia, vol.9, issue.1, pp.90067-90071

S. Ortigue, J. C. Thompson, R. Parasuraman, and S. T. Grafton, Spatio-temporal 14 dynamics of human intention understanding in temporo-parietal cortex: A combined 15, 2009.

, EEG/fMRI repetition suppression paradigm, PLoS ONE, issue.9, p.4


A. Perry, N. F. Troje, and S. Bentin, Exploring motor system contributions to the 18 perception of social information: Evidence from EEG activity in the mu/alpha frequency 19 range, Social Neuroscience, vol.5, issue.3, pp.272-284, 2010.

B. Pomiechowska and G. Csibra, Motor activation during action perception depends 21 on action interpretation, Neuropsychologia, pp.84-91, 2016.

, Directing visual attention during action observation modulates corticospinal excitability

, PLoS ONE, vol.13, issue.1, pp.1-15

J. M. Zacks, B. Tversky, and G. Iyer, Perceiving, remembering, and communicating 3 structure in events, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol.130, issue.1, pp.29-58, 2001.