P. Jacob and M. Jeannerod, The motor theory of social cognition: A critique, Trends Cogn. Sci, vol.9, pp.21-25, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ijn_00352455

N. Sebanz and G. Knoblich, Prediction in Joint Action: What, When, and Where, Top. Cogn. Sci, vol.1, pp.353-367, 2009.

S. T. Grafton and A. F. Hamilton, Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain, Hum. Mov. Sci, vol.26, pp.590-616, 2007.

R. P. Cooper, N. Ruh, and D. Mareschal, The goal circuit model: A hierarchical multi-route model of the acquisition and control of routine sequential action in humans, Cogn. Sci, vol.38, pp.244-274, 2014.

J. M. Zacks, B. Tversky, and G. Iyer, Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen, vol.130, pp.29-58, 2001.

D. A. Baldwin, J. A. Baird, M. M. Saylor, and M. A. Clark, Infants Parse Dynamic Action. Child Dev, vol.72, pp.708-717, 2001.

M. A. Novack, E. M. Wakefield, and S. Goldin-meadow, What makes a movement a gesture?, Cognition, vol.146, pp.339-348, 2016.

M. Hrka?, M. F. Wurm, and R. I. Schubotz, Action observers implicitly expect actors to act goal-coherently, even if they do not: An fMRI study, Hum. Brain Mapp, vol.35, pp.2178-2190, 2014.

C. Ansuini, A. Cavallo, C. Bertone, and C. Becchio, The visible face of intention: Why kinematics matters, Front. Psychol, vol.5, pp.1-6, 2014.

P. Bach, T. Nicholson, and M. Hudson, The affordance-matching hypothesis: how objects guide action understanding and prediction, Front. Hum. Neurosci, vol.8, p.254, 2014.

M. F. Wurm and R. I. Schubotz, What's she doing in the kitchen? Context helps when actions are hard to recognize, Psychon. Bull. Rev, pp.1-7, 2016.

M. F. Wurm and R. I. Schubotz, NeuroImage Squeezing lemons in the bathroom: Contextual information modulates action recognition, Neuroimage, vol.59, pp.1551-1559, 2012.

C. Catmur, Understanding intentions from actions: Direct perception, inference, and the roles of mirror and mentalizing systems, Conscious. Cogn, 2015.

, Scientific RepoRtS |, vol.10, p.5065, 2020.

J. M. Kilner and C. D. Frith, Action Observation: Inferring Intentions without Mirror Neurons, Curr. Biol, vol.18, pp.32-33, 2008.

M. Thioux, V. Gazzola, and C. Keysers, Action Understanding: How, What and Why, Curr. Biol, vol.18, pp.431-434, 2008.

P. Avanzini, Spatiotemporal dynamics in understanding hand-object interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol.110, pp.15878-85, 2013.

S. Ortigue, C. Sinigaglia, G. Rizzolatti, and S. T. Grafton, Understanding actions of others: The electrodynamics of the left and right hemispheres. A high-density EEG neuroimaging study, Plos One, vol.5, 2010.

J. Decroix and S. Kalénine, Timing of grip and goal activation during action perception: a priming study, Exp. Brain Res, vol.236, pp.2411-2426, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02109222

M. Costantini, G. Committeri, and G. Galati, Effector-and target-independent representation of observed actions: Evidence from incidental repetition priming, Exp. Brain Res, vol.188, pp.341-351, 2008.

A. Hafri, A. Papafragou, and J. C. Trueswell, Getting the Gist of Events: Recognition of Two-Participant Actions From Brief Displays, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen, vol.142, pp.880-905, 2012.

J. M. Kilner, More than one pathway to action understanding, Trends Cogn. Sci, vol.15, pp.352-357, 2011.

J. M. Kilner, K. J. Friston, and C. D. Frith, Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system, Cogn. Process, vol.8, pp.159-166, 2007.

F. Donnarumma, M. Costantini, E. Ambrosini, K. Friston, and G. Pezzulo, Action perception as hypothesis testing, Cortex, vol.89, pp.45-60, 2017.

L. Maffongelli, Distinct brain signatures of content and structure violation during action observation, Neuropsychologia, vol.75, pp.30-39, 2015.

T. Sitnikova, G. Kuperberg, and P. J. Holcomb, Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: An electrophysiological investigation, Psychophysiology, vol.40, pp.160-164, 2003.

T. Sitnikova, P. J. Holcomb, K. A. Kiyonaga, and G. R. Kuperberg, Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events, J. Cogn. Neurosci, vol.20, pp.2037-2057, 2008.

A. M. Proverbio and F. Riva, RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions, Neurosci. Lett, vol.459, pp.142-146, 2009.

A. M. Proverbio, F. Riva, and A. Zani, When neurons do not mirror the agent's intentions: Sex differences in neural coding of goaldirected actions, Neuropsychologia, vol.48, pp.1454-1463, 2010.

L. Mudrik, D. Lamy, and L. Y. Deouell, ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing, Neuropsychologia, vol.48, pp.507-524, 2010.

L. Amoruso, N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context, Front. Hum. Neurosci, vol.7, p.57, 2013.

P. Bach, T. C. Gunter, G. Knoblich, W. Prinz, and A. D. Friederici, N400-like negativities in action perception reflect the activation of two components of an action representation, Soc. Neurosci, vol.4, pp.212-232, 2009.

M. Van-elk, H. T. Van-schie, and H. Bekkering, Conceptual knowledge for understanding other's actions is organized primarily around action goals, Exp. Brain Res, vol.189, pp.99-107, 2008.

Y. Chang, Left centro-parieto-temporal response to tool-gesture incongruity: an ERP study, Behav. Brain Funct, vol.14, p.6, 2018.

M. Van-elk, R. Bousardt, H. Bekkering, and H. T. Van-schie, Using goal-and grip-related information for understanding the correctness of other's actions: An ERP study, Plos One, vol.7, pp.1-8, 2012.

S. Ortigue, J. C. Thompson, R. Parasuraman, and S. T. Grafton, Spatio-temporal dynamics of human intention understanding in temporo-parietal cortex: A combined EEG/fMRI repetition suppression paradigm, Plos One, vol.4, 2009.

C. Heyes, Submentalizing: I Am Not Really Reading Your Mind, Perspect. Psychol. Sci, vol.9, pp.131-143, 2014.

A. C. Giglio, L. Minati, and P. S. Boggio, Throwing the banana away and keeping the peel: Neuroelectric responses to unexpected but physically feasible action endings, Brain Res, vol.1532, pp.56-62, 2013.

S. J. Luck, An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, 2014.

Y. Wamain, E. Pluciennicka, and S. Kalénine, Temporal dynamics of action perception: Differences on ERP evoked by object-related and non-object-related actions, Neuropsychologia, vol.63, pp.249-258, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02109765

Y. Wamain, A. Sahaï, J. Decroix, Y. Coello, and S. Kalénine, Conflict between gesture representations extinguishes ? rhythm desynchronization during manipulable object perception: an EEG study, Biol. Psychol, vol.132, pp.202-211, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02109219

J. Decroix and S. Kalénine, What first drives visual attention during the recognition of object-directed actions? The role of kinematics and goal information. Attention, Perception, Psychophys, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02952935

M. V. Peelen and P. E. Downing, The neural basis of visual body perception, Nat. Rev. Neurosci, vol.8, pp.636-684, 2007.

C. Bledowski, Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study, J. Neurosci, vol.24, pp.9353-9360, 2004.

R. Kothari, P. Bokariya, S. Singh, and R. Singh, Comprehensive Review on Methodologies Employed for Visual Evoked Potentials. Scientifica (Cairo), vol.2016, pp.1-9, 2016.

R. Sharma, S. Joshi, K. D. Singh, and A. Kumar, Visual evoked potentials: Normative values and gender differences, J. Clin. Diagnostic Res, vol.9, pp.12-15, 2015.

B. Rossion, C. A. Joyce, G. W. Cottrell, and M. J. Tarr, Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex, Neuroimage, vol.20, pp.1609-1624, 2003.

M. Kutas and K. D. Federmeier, Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP), Annu. Rev. Psychol, 2011.

L. Maffongelli, A. D'-ausilio, L. Fadiga, and M. M. Daum, The ontogenesis of action syntax, Collabra Psychol, vol.5, pp.1-11, 2019.

W. C. West and P. J. Holcomb, Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures, Cogn. Brain Res, vol.13, pp.363-375, 2002.

E. Ambrosini, Looking Ahead: Anticipatory Gaze and Motor Ability in Infancy, PLoS One, vol.8, pp.1-9, 2013.

E. Geangu, I. Senna, E. Croci, and C. Turati, The effect of biomechanical properties of motion on infants' perception of goal-directed grasping actions, J. Exp. Child Psychol, vol.129, pp.55-67, 2015.

J. R. Flanagan and R. S. Johansson, Action plans used in action observation, Nature, vol.424, pp.769-771, 2003.

J. S. Buresh and A. L. Woodward, Infants track action goals within and across agents, Cognition, vol.104, pp.287-314, 2007.

L. J. Buxbaum, A. D. Shapiro, and H. B. Coslett, Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis, Brain, vol.137, pp.1971-1985, 2014.

C. Becchio, A. Koul, C. Ansuini, C. Bertone, and A. Cavallo, Seeing mental states: An experimental strategy for measuring the observability of other minds, Phys. Life Rev, vol.24, pp.67-80, 2018.

S. Uithol and M. Paulus, What do infants understand of others' action? A theoretical account of early social cognition, Psychol. Res, vol.78, pp.609-622, 2014.

J. Michael and A. D'-ausilio, Domain-specific and domain-general processes in social perception -A complementary approach, Conscious. Cogn, vol.36, pp.434-437, 2015.

R. C. Oldfield, The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory, Neuropsychologia, vol.9, pp.97-113, 1971.

G. Gratton, M. G. Coles, and E. Donchin, A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol, vol.55, pp.468-484, 1983.

G. A. Miller, G. Gration, and C. M. Yee, Generalized Implementation of an Eye Movement Correction Procedure, Psychophysiology, vol.25, pp.241-243, 1988.

S. J. Luck and N. Gaspelin, How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't), Psychophysiology, vol.54, pp.146-157, 2017.

Y. Wamain, E. Pluciennicka, and S. Kalénine, A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations, Neuropsychologia, vol.71, pp.28-37, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02109761

E. C. Leek, C. J. Atherton, and G. Thierry, Computational mechanisms of object constancy for visual recognition revealed by eventrelated potentials, Vision Res, vol.47, pp.706-713, 2007.

G. Kovács, Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans, Cereb. Cortex, vol.16, pp.742-753, 2006.

M. Bortoletto, J. B. Mattingley, and R. Cunnington, Action intentions modulate visual processing during action perception, Neuropsychologia, vol.49, pp.2097-2104, 2011.

S. G. Boehm, B. Dering, and G. Thierry, Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: A question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude, Neuropsychologia, vol.49, pp.2082-2089, 2011.

S. Kumar, E. Y. Yoon, and G. W. Humphreys, Perceptual and motor-based responses to hand actions on objects: Evidence from ERPs. Exp, Brain Res, vol.220, pp.153-164, 2012.

L. Renoult, X. Wang, V. Calcagno, M. Prévost, and J. B. Debruille, From N400 to N300: Variations in the timing of semantic processing with repetition, Neuroimage, vol.61, pp.206-215, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02646500

D. Bates, M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker, Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw, vol.67, 2015.

A. Kuznetsova, P. Brockhoff, R. Christensen, and . Lmertest-package, Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models, J. Stat. Softw, vol.82, pp.1-26, 2017.

S. G. Luke, Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R, Behav. Res. Methods, vol.49, pp.1494-1502, 2017.

R. Lenth, Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means, 2019.

C. M. Judd, J. Westfall, and D. A. Kenny, Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power, Annu. Rev. Psychol, vol.68, pp.601-625, 2017.

J. Westfall, D. A. Kenny, and C. M. Judd, Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen, vol.143, pp.2020-2045, 2014.

M. Brysbaert and M. Stevens, Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial, J. Cogn, vol.1, pp.1-20, 2018.