Intensive care units (ICUs) provide care for critical patients at high risk of morbidity and mortality, and require continuous monitoring of clinical, biological and, imaging parameters. Collaborative ventures have enabled the emergence of large open access databases for the secondary use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). The objective of this work was to evaluate the availability of scripts and datasets in publications based on ICU open-access databases. We included 910 original articles based on four ICU open-access databases (Amsterdam University Medical Centers Database, eICU Collaborative Research Database, High time resolution ICU dataset, and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care). The majority of the studies did not provide their data management scripts (n=839, 92.9%), neither the analysis script (n=843, 93.4%) in the article. Attempts to contact the 845 corresponding authors in question resulted in 89.11% (n=753) of our e-mail requests going unanswered over a two-month period. We received 51 automated messages (55.43%) indicating that emails have not been delivered, while 6 messages (6.52%) redirected to alternative email addresses. Only 20 corresponding authors (18.18%) answered, finally providing the requested materials. Despite scientific journals recommendations to share materials, our study unveils the absence of crucial components for the replication of studies by other research teams.